UCLA/Getty Conservation Program

A graduate conservation training program focusing on the conservation of archaeological and ethnographic materials


Leave a comment

Class of 2016 3rd year Internship & Thesis Presentations

It’s the end of the quarter and today, the class of 2016 returns to our conservation training labs at the Getty Villa to give their final presentations as graduate students in our program.  They will be presenting on their 3rd year internships, as well as discussing the work they did for their MA thesis projects.  The day will end with a  small reception to celebrate the completion of their conservation degree and graduation!

A list of their 3rd year internship placements can be found on this previous post.   Here is a list of the M.A. thesis research they will also be sharing with us:

  • Colette Badmagharian – Piecing together the History of an 18th-century printed Armenian Prayer Scroll: The Study of Cultural Context and Manufacturing Techniques
  • Betsy Burr – Dye analysis of archaeological Peruvian textiles using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)
  • Lesley Day – A Study of the Moiré Pattern of Tortoiseshell: Morphology of the Pattern, Techniques for Documentation, and Alterations of the Pattern and Shell by Accelerated Light Aging 
  • Tom McClintock – Documentation and Technical Study of Torqua  Cave
  • William Shelley – Biocorrosion of Archaeological Glass
  • Heather White – An Analysis of Unidentified Dark Materials Between Inlaid Motifs on Andean Wooden Qeros

Congratulations to the class of 2016 and good luck on your presentations today!


Leave a comment

Class of 2018 Summer Internships

The quarter is coming to an end and as our students are working to finish up object treatments and projects, they’re also getting ready to head out on their summer internships.  Here’s a list of the great places our students will be going to this summer:

We hope they enjoy their time at their internship sites and we look forward to hearing about the work they did when they come back this fall!


Leave a comment

Beantown or Bust – the 2016 ANAGPIC Conference

It’s that time of the year again….No, not when we sit back in LA enjoying the 85° weather and work on our tans, while the Midwest and Northeast deals with freezing temperatures and 1-3 inches of snow in April (too soon?)….But that time when students from North American conservation graduate programs gather for the annual ANAGPIC conference.

This year the conference is being hosted by the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies, Harvard Art Museums and will take place April 14th-16th.  In addition to the great papers that will be presented highlighting student work from many conservation specialties, this year includes a poster lightning round.  The conference also coincides with the Joint Interim Meeting of ICOM-CC’s Scientific Research and Education and Training in Conservation Working Groups.  That meeting will be held at the same location, on April 13-14th, prior to the start of ANAGPIC .

This year we have a few presentations from UCLA/Getty students.  3rd year student Colette Badmagharian will present the results of her research on an Armenian prayer scroll that she conducted as part of their MA thesis project.  We also have two 1st year students, Marci Burton and Lindsay Ocal, who will be presenting in the lightning round session.  You can find presentation titles and abstracts below.

For more information on the ANAGPIC 2016 conference, to access the conference schedule or read the abstracts of the papers that will be presented, please visit site: http://harvardanagpic16.com/  Information about the ICOM-CC Joint Interim Meeting can be found here: http://icom-ccharvard.com/

Good luck to all those presenting and we hope all the students have a great time at this year’s ANAGPIC Conference!


 

Presentations
18th-century Armenian Prayer Scroll: The Study of Cultural Context and the Characterization of Manufacturing Techniques 
Colette Badmagharian
For centuries, prayer scrolls and illuminated Gospels have played a crucial role in Armenian history and culture. Relatively little is known about the materials and techniques used to construct such Armenian texts and potential risks for their survival. To bridge this gap in our knowledge, a severely damaged 18th-century Armenian prayer scroll was investigated, using a holistic and integrated approach that combined both cultural and historical context with scientific research. Selected texts and illustrations were translated and thoroughly examined with members of the Armenian community and further investigated with comparative examples from various institutions. This examination led to an appropriate preventive conservation measure that was taken to ensure the preservation of the fragile prayer scrolls.  Pigments, colorants, and ink, were characterized with the use of non-invasive and non-destructive techniques including analytical photography, ultraviolet, visible and near infrared (UV-Vis-NIR) fiber optic reflectance spectroscopy (FORS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Raman spectromicroscopy (mRS). This study provided an overall understanding of the constituent materials, printing techniques, religious significance, use and function, as well as traditional practices of the Armenian culture in the 18th-century.
Poster Lightning Round
3D Computed Tomographic Analysis of a Pre-Columbian Chilean Child Mummy Bundle
Marci Burton
Analysis and Retreatment of an Archaeological Polychrome Ceramic Bowl from Amapa, Mexico
 Lindsay Ocal


Leave a comment

UCLA/Getty Program Welcomes Visiting Scholar Dr. Pujun Jin

The UCLA/Getty Conservation Program welcomes visiting scholar Dr. Pujun Jin, who will be with us through November 2016.  During his time here, he will be working Dr. David Scott examining ancient Chinese bronzes. Dr. Jin joins us from the School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, China.  He received his Ph.D. in Scientific History and Archaeometry from the University of Science and Technology of China. His current research focuses on the metallurgical examination of artifacts excavated from the site of Sanxidui dating to the Shang Dynasty.  He is also studying the lost-wax technique used to cast a bronze mou (cooking vessel) from the Ba Culture and the corrosion and conservation of ancient Chinese plated bronzes.

Pujun Jin


Leave a comment

UCLA/Getty Program Welcomes Mellon Fellow in Conservation Education Laleña Vellanoweth

The UCLA/Getty Program is pleased to welcome Laleña Vellanoweth as the Andrew W. Mellon Fellow in Conservation Education for the 2015-16 academic year.

Laleña is a Costume and Textile Conservator. She received her B.S. in Biochemistry and B.A. in Art from California State University, Los Angeles and her M.A. in Art History and Certificate in Conservation from the Institute of Fine Arts at New York University. She has worked at the Costume Institute at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Modern Art, the Autry National Center, and Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

As part of her Mellon Fellowship, she will be researching diversity in art conservation and surveying parallel diversity programs for other museum fields. She will also be working on a research project on Californio costume, focusing on a technical study of three charro suits from the early nineteenth century, one of which was worn by Don Vincente Lugo, a member of one of the founding families of Los Angeles. Laleña will also give lectures on textiles and costume, including fiber identification and costume mounting.

IMG_2394


Leave a comment

Welcome Class of 2018!

Today we welcomed the start of fall (despite the warm LA weather), and the new incoming class of the UCLA/Getty Program!

The class of 2018 will begin their first day of instruction tomorrow with a course focusing on documentation and imaging techniques.  They’ll also have the opportunity to take classes this quarter that cover the technology and deterioration of ceramics and glass, principles and ethics in conservation, and science fundamentals in conservation. Two of their courses include object-based projects where they will examine, document and assess the condition of a group of pre-Columbian ceramics from the collection of the Fowler Museum at UCLA.  Between their course and lab work, it looks like we will be keeping them pretty busy this quarter!

We wish the class of 2018 good luck with their coursework and lots of success in the conservation program!

From L to R: Marci Burton, Lindsay Ocal, Hayley Monroe, Michaela Paulson, Morgan Burgess, Mari Hagemeyer

The class of 2018! From L to R: Marci Burton, Lindsay Ocal, Hayley Monroe, Michaela Paulson, Morgan Burgess, Mari Hagemeyer


Leave a comment

“Animal, Vegetable, Mineral?” – Identifying mystery fibers in the field

When conservators are working on archaeological excavations, their work often encompasses many different aspects of field conservation.  This can include materials identification and characterization, lifting fragile artifacts and aiding in archaeological research.  No matter what facet of the project they are involved in, the work can be challenging without the comforts of a well-stocked lab and requires lots of problem solving and improvisation.  Last summer while working on the Ancient Methone Archaeological Project, we were faced with the challenge of trying to identify an unusual looking fibrous material which required us to MacGyver a transmitted light microscope to aid in the examination and identification of the mystery fibers.

During the 2014 season, a team of geomorphologists working on the project were taking core samples in an area thought to be an ancient harbor.  In one of the cores, they pulled out a clump of fibers they thought might be cordage (fig. 1).  They brought the samples to the conservation lab to see if we could identify the fibers and determine if it was cordage or the remnants of woven fibers. Some samples were set aside for radiocarbon dating and the remainder of the sample, which was still bound in sediment, was examined.

Figure 1. Clump of fibers found in soil core by Geomorph team. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 1. Clump of fibers found in a core sample taken by the Geomorphology team. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

The initial macroscopic examination revealed that the fibers appeared translucent (fig. 2).  They seemed to be grouped into bundles and some of these bundles initially appeared to cross each other, giving the impression of a woven structure.

Fgiure 2. Detail of the fibers encased in the sediment.  The fibers are translucent and are grouped in bundles.  Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Fgiure 2. Detail of the fibers encased in the sediment. The fibers are translucent and are grouped in bundles. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

The fibrous material was encased in a gray, silty sediment, which appeared to include quartz, foliated phyllosilicates/sheet silicates (like mica, vermiculite, etc.) (fig. 3), as well as small shells, both fragmented and whole (fig. 4). The sample was initially wet, and was allowed to slowly dry out in the lab. The sediment was gently pushed away using a pin-vise under binocular magnification, to better define the structures and reveal diagnostic features of the material for its identification (fig. 5).  Photographs of the fibers were taken using the DinoLite USB microscope (7013MZT Series). During this examination and initial cleaning, the fibers were found to be very brittle.  Though they appeared to be in bundles, they were not actually bound to each other and could be easily separated.

Figure 3.  During cleaning, plate-like inclusions were found in the soil and between the fiber bundles.  These inclusions resembled sheet silicates like mica. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 3. During cleaning, plate-like inclusions were found in the soil and between the fiber bundles. These inclusions resembled sheet silicates like mica. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 4.  Small shells or shell fragments were also found in the deposit. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 4. Small shells or shell fragments were also found in the deposit. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 5.  After some initial cleaning to remove soil, more of the fiber bundles and associated materials are visible. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 5. After some initial cleaning to remove soil, more of the fiber bundles and associated materials are visible. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Though examination with a stereomicroscope helped to reveal more about the fibers and the structure of the bundles, we were not able to clearly identify what the fibers were.  We felt that examination using transmitted light microscopy would be the most helpful since it could highlight any morphological features in the fiber that could aid in identification.  So we set out to make one armed with our DinoLite microscope and a flashlight. The set up turned out to be quite simple. We just needed to be able to shine a light through the fibers from below and examine the fibers at a high magnification using the DinoLite (fig. 6). We took a fiber bundle from the sediment and placed it on a multi-bulb LED flashlight (fig. 7).  This flashlight was flat and rectangular and the ideal shape for our light source since the fiber samples could be directly placed on the top surface of the flashlight.  The fact that the flashlight was flat also meant it was easy to position the light source under the microscope where needed (fig. 8).

Figure 6.  We created a transmittled light microscope using the DinoLite USB microscope and an LED flashlight which acted as the transmitted light source. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 6. We created a transmittled light microscope using the DinoLite USB microscope and an LED flashlight which acted as the transmitted light source. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 7. We placed samples of the fibers directly onto the flashlight during examination. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 7. We placed samples of the fibers directly onto the flashlight during examination. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 8.  Using our transmitted light  microscope to examine the fibers.  Macguyver would be proud. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 8. Using our transmitted light microscope to examine the fibers. Macgyver would be proud! Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Looking at the fibers in transmitted light, we observed a central void within some of the fibers.  Since we were considering the possibility of the fibers being organic in nature, we thought these central voids could be the medulla or lumen of an organic fiber (fig. 9). However, no other morphological features were present that helped us determine at this point what the fibers were.

Figure 9. Looking at the fibers under transmitted light, we could see they had a central void, which initially made us think this was the lumen of a plant fiber or medulla of an animal fiber. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 9. Looking at the fibers under transmitted light, we could see they had a central void, which initially made us think this was the lumen of a plant fiber or medulla of an animal fiber. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

We were also able to take a look at the cross-section of the fibers with the addition of a polarizing lens on the DinoLite (fig 10). Some fibers appeared hexagonal in section (fig. 11).  Some of the ends of the fibers ended in a point or were triangular in shape.

Figure 9.  With the addition of a polarizing lens on the DinoLite we were able to see the cross-sections of some of the fibers.  Some appeared hexagonal or triangular in section. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 9. With the addition of a polarizing lens on the DinoLite we were able to see the cross-sections of some of the fibers. Some appeared hexagonal or triangular in section. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 11.  Details of the fibers showing their shape in section.  Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 11. Details of the fibers showing their shape in section. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Further cleaning revealed a tiered growth structure that resembled the growth of minerals more than plant or animal fiber bundles (fig. 12).  The inclusion of sheet silicates in relation to the fibers, either located between bundles or within them further suggested these fibers were mineral.  In searching the literature we came across images of asbestos minerals which looked similar to our mystery fibers.  Several types of asbestos minerals are fibrous in appearance (fig. 13), and can occur near phyllosilicate deposits.  Armed with this information we concluded that the fibers were definitely mineral in nature and could possibly be asbestos.

Figure 12.  Fiber bundle after cleaning. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 12. Fiber bundle after cleaning. Photo: Ancient Methone Archaeological Project

Figure 13. An image of crocidolite, a fibrous form of the mineral riebeckite, and one of the 6 recognized forms of asebstos minerals.  © Raimond Spekking / , via Wikimedia Commons https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Krokydolith_-_Mineralogisches_Museum_Bonn_%287385%29.jpg

Figure 13. An image of crocidolite, a fibrous form of the mineral riebeckite, and one of the 6 recognized forms of asebstos minerals. © Raimond Spekking / , via Wikimedia Commons https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Krokydolith_-_Mineralogisches_Museum_Bonn_%287385%29.jpg

Luckily we were able to bring a sample of the fibers back with us and conduct some analysis in the UCLA/Getty Conservation labs. And we were quite surprised by the results!  It turns out we were correct in deducing the fibers were mineral in nature, but we were incorrect about which mineral. XRF and XRD analysis did not find any asbestos minerals in the sample, but instead the fibers were identified as calcite (fig. 14).  Though we had never seen calcite that was fibrous in appearance, it is one of the mineral’s crystal forms. An example is shown in fig. 15 where you can see the SEM image of “lublinite”, a needle-type of calcite whose form is thought to be associated with the activity of microorganisms.

Figure 14. XRD analysis results showing the fibers were composed of calcite.

Figure 14. XRD analysis results showing the fibers were composed of calcite.

Figure 15. SEM image of lublinite, the fibrous form of calcite.  Image taken from: http://www.speleonics.com.au/jills/bymineral/lublinite.html

Figure 15. SEM image of lublinite, the fibrous form of calcite. Image taken from: http://www.speleonics.com.au/jills/bymineral/lublinite.html

Even though we were not able to identify the fibers as calcite in the field, the use of a stereomicroscope and our makeshift transmitted light microscope certainly helped distinguish their mineral nature and rule out plant or animal origins.  And now that we’ve figured out how to make a transmitted light microscope and tested it out, we’re ready for any future material ID questions that would require one.

MacGyver looks on and smiles at our ingenuity.  Photo: http://macgyver.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_problems_solved_by_MacGyver

MacGyver looks on and smiles at our ingenuity. Photo: http://macgyver.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_problems_solved_by_MacGyver

Written by the 2014 Ancient Methone Archaeological Project Conservation Team: Heather White (UCLA/Getty Program Grad Student, Class of ’16), Vanessa Muros (Conservation Specialist/Lecturer, UCLA/Getty Program) and Anna Weiss (Campus Art/Artifact Collections Coordinator, Conservator, Univ. of Chicago)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,913 other followers